🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils is set to be slashed by more than half, following a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to put the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more councillors depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations frequently spent years building community backing and pushing their councils to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, saying communities ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has stated it aims to end “race-based” approaches, and says it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to create other types of wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation suggested the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that voted to keep their wards.